July 23, 2006
Wind farm developer ‘moves proposed Burnham turbines at 11th hour’
The group fighting plans for a wind farm on the outskirts of Burnham-On-Sea claimed on Sunday (July 23rd) that Ecotricity, the developer behind the scheme, has submitted 11th hour amendments to its planning application.
Andrew Manning, spokesperson for the KNOll to Windfarm action group told Burnham-On-Sea.com that the developer has moved the proposed wind turbines away from the railway line because such a location would have “broken government guidelines.”
Mr Manning explained: “We are surprised at this amendment to the application; we recall that Ecotricity’s Chief Executive commented in the press at the time of the application being submitted that it ‘is a very robust one and can and will meet any criticism thrown at it’.
![How the wind farm would look next to the railway line [Photomontage: Ecotricity]](https://www.burnham-on-sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/wind-farm-photo-2-sml.jpg)
“Since then, Ecotricity has had to submit additional details about access, and now has been forced to move the proposed location further away from the railway lines as the original location of the turbines contravened Government policies and presented a serious safety risk to the West Coast main line.”
“We also recall that Ecotricity had misquoted a report by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors on its website – which it amended when we pointed this out – and has also been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority for claims it made about another of its developments.”
“This leads us to worry how professional the developer actually is, and whether there is anything else that Ecotricity has omitted, forgotten, or needs to change in its application. Clearly, Ecotricity has its own interpretation of what ‘robust’ means.”
“We are also puzzled at the need to move the potential location; surely if these turbines are as robust a structure as claimed then there can be no danger of collapse if they are located, as originally proposed, closer to the railway lines? What about the danger to public rights of way, houses, village facilities, and the local school?”
“Surely this revision to the application is a tacit admission of risk? Either that, or is an act of expediency to remove an objection from Network Rail. Again, this would not fill us full of confidence. No doubt Sedgemoor’s planning department and planning committee will be as perplexed and concerned as we are.”
Ecotricity was not available for comment on Sunday.
RELATED LINKS:
Burnham MP attacks county council plans for more wind farms
Public meeting to be held on wind farm plans
Wind farm pressure group sets out its objections
Burnham Without parish councillors vote against wind farm
David Bellamy adds his support to wind farm protests
Pro-wind farm group hits back after council’s decision
Protesters celebrate after town planners back them
Wind farm protestors hit back in row over tourism
Actor John Cleese supports wind farm protest group
Wind farm would ‘hurt local tourism’ claim protesters
Council announces start of Burnham wind farm consultation period
Protest group’s anger after posters are pulled down
Wind farm boss hits back in row over power generation
Wind farm boss challenged to meet protesters
Protestors challenge Ecotricity power generation figures
Wind farm bid labled ‘invalid’ by district planners
14 new photos of proposed wind farm are released
Wind farm application reaches district planners
New photomotage images of wind farm released
Shock photos of wind farm accidents “show the risks”
MP David Heathcoat-Amory gives his backing to wind group
MP to visit wind farm protestors at Brent Knoll
New pro-wind farm group backs Edithmead wind farm plans
‘Property prices will be hit by proposed wind farm’ claims action group
Wind farm group pushes green agenda
Ecotricity holds wind farm open day
New action group formed to fight wind farm
Council leader slams plans for wind farm
Huge new wind farm proposed for Edithmead
